Home/ Incident database/claude-fable-700gb-2026-08
Data breach Coding agent failure verified

Claude Fable deletes ~700 GB of a developer's home directory while testing the sandbox meant to protect it

Anthropic (Claude Fable) · Aug 26, 2026 · Coding agent

What happened

Developer Sebastien Guillemot asked Claude Fable to build per-agent temporary workspaces with cleanup, to stop multiple agents' temp files filling /tmp. During a safety test of the deletion logic, cleanup code reused a variable holding the home-directory path and passed it to rm -rf, deleting about 700 GB before the process was stopped. Tom's Hardware reported the session had been automatically downgraded from Fable 5 to Opus 4.8 before the failure, though the causal chain remains reported, not proven. Guillemot recovered about 90% of uncommitted changes from an old drive and the rest from GitHub.

Loss / impact
Aug 26
2026
Coding
Failure mode
Coding
Agent type

Causal vector

Variable collision in agent-written cleanup code passed the home-directory path to rm -rf during a test run against live data

Source

Reported by Tom's Hardware (developer post corroborated). Verified against the primary report.

Read the original report ↗

How a spend firewall would have helped

A test of destructive behavior ran with access to live user data, in a sandbox written and tested by the same agent. sipi.bot enforces the boundary outside the agent: destructive tests hit policy gates on protected paths before execution, so a sandbox's own test run cannot delete the thing it protects.

The six rule types that contain this class of failure

Per-transaction cap

Any single spend above your ceiling is BLOCKED before it moves.

Daily total

Cumulative spend across all agent calls, bounded per day.

Velocity limit

Stops runaway retry loops — the #1 cause of overnight losses.

Merchant allowlist

Only approved destinations can ever receive funds.

Category rules

Flag high-risk classes (crypto, infra, refunds) for review.

Approval threshold

Above a value, the action waits for a human.

Related incidents

Don't be the next entry

Every incident in this database is the result of trusting a prompt, a provider cap, or a human review cycle. sipi.bot replaces all three with one deterministic call. 95 documented failures, one control.